I’m a little tired of trying to sound like a big expert writer with my blog
entry’s when I’m really not. There are so many people, including many people on
Facebook, who write really well compared to me. I’m an amateur writer and choose
to write mostly because it helps organize my thoughts but also because I’ve
learned that it helps me think through more possibilities in the pursuit of
knowledge. Writing is really a form of thinking and so the process has added
some complexity to my views of life in this way. I write like an authority but I
really have no authority just arguments and observations I like to think
matter.
For much of my adult life I’ve admired the honest evangelist Billy Graham.
I would watch his televised addresses broadcast from baseball stadiums across
the world and I had a collection of tapes of His religious gatherings that had
beautiful singing, testimonies, and Billy preaching the word of God. In my
twenties I would drink beers watching the tapes when I was alone and
seeking much needed spiritual support and uplift in my life. Billy called on the
enormous audiences before him to come forward and accept Jesus Christ into their
lives. He would quote the Bible telling his audience: “You must be born again of
the Spirit”.
I really admired Billy and I myself believe in the actual historical
existence of a figure known as Jesus Christ. What has changed for me somewhat is
greater knowledge of the world and of history.
The more I’ve had time to think over the years the more I’ve dared asked
myself and God some questions. One question I’ve felt compelled to ask is why
would this existence be such an unfair place when it came to the experiential
chances, and therefore limited opportunity, to hear such a message preached by
Billy Graham in order to be saved. Why would so many of us in this life
therefore have no fair potential at reaching the saving ideas said to be our
only hope beyond this world.
I wonder why the rules of existence would be so unfair like this. Why would
God and His created universe calculate terms that the odds of humanity finding
hope were odds this desperate and this hopeless a picture for so many.
Multitudes of people, accordingly if such terms are correct, will perish
from the odds allowed by those conditions of experience and opportunity. Such
reasoning only allows safe passage to a narrow few out of so many other billions
of lost souls in life. Such thinking suggests that God demands from us that we
must know certain doctrine accurately but doctrine outside many of our human
experiences in this world to know.
People fearfully cling to their Bible’s and recite word for word assertions
based on, according to them, a flawless literally interpreted word of how
history supposedly, word for word, literally happened too.
This is a dangerous life when it comes to physical survival and the ideas
human beings dabble in. This life is even more dangerous then we think. If what
these systems of thought to date, engineered into concepts, various persuasions,
antidotes, and truth claims, are totally correct, word for word in their claims,
we all are facing even far worse danger then we could ever of foresaw in our
more rosy care free moments of joy. For if ideology in life must be sorted
through for explanations of hope and if out of that journey one specific
ideology, of so many, must be adopted, and this is how humanity will be
determined a fate in the afterlife, then we the sifters, the simple, navigating,
error finding persons in this confusing world, best hope we somehow, by rather
feeble odds of hope for many of us, grasp unto the right ideological antidote
for hope. We better secure for ourselves that arbitrary antidote wisely
otherwise we'll go elsewhere then somewhere pleasant with multitudes of other
abandoned human beings running along with us.
With so many ideas confusing us, them being diverse and distinct from each
other, with them moving across language, culture, tradition, being shaped by
histories of family genealogy, then, within this smorgasbord of truth claims and
claimed certitudes that are all wrestling for our agreement, is this how God
really will unevenly award out rewards and punishments? If this is how it is,
this gloom and doomsday calling we are asked to accept on planet Earth, and our
hope really only wrests in a minority of voices who stumble into a stadium and
hear a charismatic evangelists message being motivated to disturb us into
repentance then how is this a fair world for many.
While such weak voices make such proclamations into the wind billions of
other people, many decent people in India, China, Africa, Indonesia, Iran,
slink off into the sunset of their graves void of this antidote that might of
offered them this saving grace.
We are in one desperate pickle if God isn’t fairer then we are and we
should tremble and shake and let our despair overwhelm us for keeps because life
is one strange experiment then.
Why would there be an inferno like punishment of hell for doctrinal
incompatibility also when our inadequate discovery of another mans truth is so
common to the human condition that it leads mankind to reach many different
unavoidable conclusions in how we see the world in order to believe the
different ideas that we do.
I still admire Billy and I still believe that Jesus Christ was crucified in
history and died for our sins but I have not succumb to accepting that the
downfall of most of humanity is included within that saving plan of love.
To add to my confusion of life a full scale Noah's Ark attraction and theme
park opened on July 7, 2016 in northern Kentucky. This ark is constructed with
the dimensions described in the Bible in the book of Genesis. Visitors to this
ark can see life size models of animals such as elephants, unicorns, komodo
dragons and velciraptors.
Even though the book of Genesis in the Bible says the Earth is only 6,000
years old the museum claims that there were still dinosaurs less then 6,000
years ago and that they coexisted with people of Bible times in the period of
Noah. The museum offers no explanations of how the dinosaurs then went extinct.
I watched the documentary on this Noah’s Ark museum on PBS which had
classrooms within the museum that school children visiting the ark daily filled
by the hundreds each hour of the day. They teach the children there how
dinosaurs were among the creatures to have survived the flood by being permitted
access to ride on the giant ark with all the other kinds of animals.
Apparently, for size and space issues however, the dinosaurs were
conveniently baby dinosaurs. This all explains then the archeological evidence
of dinosaurs while the earth can still be said to really be only 6,000 years old
supposedly anyway. I’m left with a reaction to these claims that for me has me
feeling a far greater skepticism then merely having just plenty of uncertain
doubts.
On the other side of looking at belief in life is the view that religion or
the idea of God is an absurd one. Such human claims of knowledge assert to have
a grasp on everything relevant about the world’s mysteries in this way enough so
to put God and questions of meaning to rest that look to the unknown for a form
of superior life. This form of atheistic belief explains for us then,
supposedly adequately enough, our meaning when it comes to these unknowns, or
ultimately our lack of meaning as we will die and cease to exist.
I wonder myself however if it could be possible that we haven't gathered
half, or even a few, of the pieces to this puzzle as of yet in order to put them
together right. Can the truth in our current understanding of our existence
remain vastly incomplete and inadequately resolved. Could the real overarching
truth of existence mysteriously still exist as a mystery beyond our present
imaginations capacity to understand it.
Maybe then truth isn't all neatly described and laid out by our proud human
knowledge claims on both sides. Could it be not only probable but extremely
likely that we don't know where we are in the firmament of the infinite
sky?
My view of humanity now isn't tribal like it was before so my views have
changed in this way too. I don't mistakenly desire to look suspiciously and with
hostility towards outsiders beyond the border of my own country. I'll only be on
this hostile earth a short while with all the conflict here. Many people in this
world will spend their lives justifying hatred and producing in familiar packs
selfishness that looks outward and casts blame on others. I choose in my beliefs
to unapologetically try and care about people everywhere regardless if their
ideas align with my beliefs or even my interests.
I'm only human so yes if some ISIS fanatic picked up a knife and sliced off
my hand I'd have to abandon my attempt to try and have love for them in that
instance. Yet really the view that all humanity is loved and matter, as hard as
at times I might try to care in this way and can’t, is how I think God really
feels about humanity.
People can and will invent all the corrosive, hateful, fanatical, division
creating ideas they can indoctrinating the sponge like audiences who are willing
to soak it up because minds love a good hate. Despite this truth though when you
show hatred you aren't really doing what is ultimately right or what really
matters in this life in my opinion. You’re acting in ways I believe that don’t
understand that love is what governs everything around us and so you miss life’s
real terms and the ultimate picture.
You might say fuck that nonsense I don’t believe that. What If however you
could have love to be real, as being what overarches everything in life, would
you permit it if you were the one to choose if it was allowed or would you
rather the way it is now in a divided judgmental world. Would you rather hold
unto the idea of this divided world, a world ultimately with no future hope or
purpose, a world where every common man is a great angry judge of his neighbor.
Many people I think would prefer this later option because they’d rather an
imperfect love in the world that was simply on their terms is the sad truth of
human belief.
When we judge each other we don't usually have a coherent explanation of
people’s history and that personal histories effects on the persons thought nor
do we have any general or adequate insight into the reality of most other
people’s lives. The challenges the human race therefore faces, and has faced
since civilization began, means that human lives have always been in a state of
real ignorance the majority of the time wherever they sat and analyzed their
surroundings and wherever they struggled in their behavior toward each other.
What we have in our knowledge when we judge each other is only little bits
and pieces of the puzzle strewn together into an argument that feels good. Our
judgment secures and justifies ourselves and our need to be right and justified
in who we are in a self serving way by pursuing our own self interest.
I think we take delight ranting and raving at other people who we think are
deserving of our condemnation from our belief we have great understanding and
righteousness. For all the injustice and calamity in the world we get to remain
pure, innocent and self-righteously right in condemning each other.
What this kind of world view misses, at least one important thing it
misses, is that real love for people understands instead that people in their
numerous states of ignorance and error have no real vision to find their way out
of error a great deal of the time.
If God is just and fair and loving I can't see Him sifting through all
humanity, across all cultures, and assigning blame ruthlessly and then excluding
from Heaven, callously, the people who are really beautiful, even when
misguided, everywhere in this world regardless what ideas exist there where they
live.
How, for instance, can a young mind in this world know what's in his or her
best interest most of the time. That mind inevitably will find the material
unavoidably, in the form of persuasive thought, that is nearest to that persons
life, and it will, regardless of it’s value, present itself to them in
charismatic form. The guided person in life then won't know how to overt their
eyes from the ideas in this innocence and so the older teachers will profit from
their vulnerability. Like parasites the idea deliverers act by offering no
saving path to avoid any of this toxicity of thinking or ideology and even they
usually don’t know any better themselves.
The mind of mankind will therefore unavoidably get poisoned in life and our
minds are blank canvasses that need direction. You can't just fill a mind with
any kind of garbage at all and expect people to be able to reason their way to
peace and safety that's what we don't seem to understand. People are stewing in
all kinds of ideas through their imagination without any real readable road
signs, with no compelling councilor in sight, and succumbing to the worst of
influences. So bad ideas lay dormant in the subconscious and within the
imagination of people while in many societies throughout this world there is a
stubborn unwillingness to help guide humanity by the right kind of teaching for
them.
When we tell youth that Jesus, for instance, has no relevance, although His
ideas really offer us life foundations for how to think healthily in our
relationships, we fail them. We fail society because God taught the clearest way
to non violence, forgiveness, and toward having real concern and compassion for
our fellow man in a demonstration of real love.
I think that God exists and looks over all of us human beings with love. I
believe that people in their fifties and sixties are still children in the eyes
of God. I think that God sees how ideologies spread, knows how those ideas move,
understands how susceptible to good and bad ideas we are in this world. I think
He knows people fall innocently into error and that people judge error
ruthlessly with severity but that those who judge are rarely fair within
themselves.
I think God gets that multitudes in certain regions of earth will fight for
meaningless causes, that regions of the planet will know different religions,
and that people will make mistakes. Instead of God severely dividing up those
with the right ideas, and casting away those with the wrong ideas, I suggest He
as our God will be merciful, fair, and show who He is which is love. He will
show us what is love fully revealed, not half-hidden, on a scale so mindboggling
we can't even begin to fathom its possibilities for us.
When I did a study of history by watching Yale and other university
lectures online I learned about Ancient Israel and about the Hebrew or Old
Testament scriptures. As the professor went through the first part of the Bible
as an historian, and not someone who takes literally accounts of talking
donkeys, man eating fish, staves turning into snakes, parting red seas, Moses in
a basket rescued from a river by Pharos daughter and etc. I took it all in and
thought about what constitutes real knowledge.
I spent fifteen years learning of ancient Greece, ancient Egypt, ancient
China, ancient Rome, then watching lectures on the middle ages, reading about
Christian history, learning of the history of science and other subjects. I
mention this to make the point that previously I had no thorough conception for
how the world works before I did this study. I still don’t understand a lot
about this world but what I did learn by this study is how humanity has always
been searching for the truth.
You no doubt have heard of the Inquisitions. That was the Church cruelly
responding to other ideas threatening their control of thought at the time.
These ideas challenged the Church’s self-professed ownership of the right to
truth. The punishments were severe too, disembowelments, torture wheels, people
burned alive etc..
The Church thought it held the only claims that were to be permitted for
human beings to think upon. Yet people, like in ancient Greece with men like
Aristotle, and many others of every age, they kept pursuing truth. Those that
came after them were other philosophers and future scientists who began
cataloging nature, philosophizing about our moral rights, constructed political
systems, and created rule of law. Such thinkers pursued many other endeavors too
too numerous to list. Some thinkers tried to understand the celestial movements
of planets in the galaxy and some thinking dared to question the absolute
authority of the Bible as literal history or the earth as the center of the
universe.
I don’t think this is bad at all even if you believe in God like I do. At
least such developments of ideas in our history unfolding like this doesn’t have
to be bad. I think truth is something we as humanity have been on course to
pursuing and desiring to figure out for a greater reason as far back as our
history of ourselves allows us to look. This is why I don’t mind Darwinian
evolutionists when their thought is on course in the pursuit of truth wanting to
find it. I don’t feel hate or hostility toward people who say there is no God
either. In my feeble opinion if humanity was all simply gullible enough to
believe in floating arks filled with unicorns and dinosaurs we wouldn’t have
much intelligence or much freedom at all to speak of.
Such thinking might fail to believe in God yes but to question the idea of
there not being a God must be something God allows, if He exists, and that I
suspect He finds unthreatening to Him unlike us who can feel greatly insulted
and threatened by it.
As humanity we wonder about many different possibilities testing
uncertainty with different preoccupations by searching and wondering about
life’s mysteries in this world. All of us can wonder about life’s mysteries and
puzzles by wondering where everything came from and where everything is going.
We can ask what really is out there in the cosmos. What natural laws don’t we
yet understand. What other life might exist and if we dare ask it if there is
hope for us. We can ask can love account for more then merely being an
evolutionary adaptation in emotion for social survival and we can ask could God
exist giving our lives further future purpose and immeasurable joy.
All through history people have asserted themselves to hold different ideas
about our world with certainty. That has always meant that it has been in our
nature to be miniature experts.
However much I may wonder about all this and try and remain open to
different possibilities my trust returns again to my Lord as the figure of a
compassionate and loving Jesus hanging on a Roman Cross. For me I really do
believe He suffered and died for our sins. Yet I think Jesus was dying too for
Hindus and Muslims and Buddhists and Atheists and the entire world population.
When the scriptures were written the writers knew nothing of the world
beyond that area of the Roman Empire and the area around ancient Israel. If they
had written the Bible with the knowledge of our world we have now the pages
would likely have been written very differently. This has to be perhaps because
the Holy scriptures have human authorship as well as Gods hand in their
creation. Imperfect people under Divine inspiration wrote the Bible over many
years.
I choose to believe this myself and yet I don’t have a complete system of
knowledge explaining history in order and completeness and I don’t think anyone
does in completeness. We can argue like we have a full account for reality on
earth so all history can be all summed up by us and so we can justify our
beliefs in this way but in reality no human being can have all of that
knowledge. I believe neither of us whether a scientist, a philosopher, a person
of faith knows this mystery adequately enough to say absolutely what lies behind
us, beyond us etc..
I don’t have a neat system therefore like some people that assert by those
arguments to know that the obviously fictitious story’s of The Old Testament for
instance, which I don’t take to be literal history, are, according to them, real
history as it occurred. According to some people to not take everything
literally in the Bible throws holes in everything else about God but I don’t
believe that to be so. I don’t know if the story’s were allegory's but I choose
to think they did come from divine inspiration in people’s lives searching for
meaning.
Regarding the natural order around us here material particles in various
configurations are said to be moving and reconfiguring in accordance with
physical law. Philosophers in response have asked that if we assume that the
series never had a beginning in time then why is there such a series when there
might have been a different one or even a changeless void.
Matter too has, in infinite space with all it's unknowns, oddly created us
people, constructed in us a complicated brain that curiously has a state of
consciousness finding us in a somewhat knowing and observing state. The mental
state we now know as living, self aware, conscious beings leads us to make some
of our arguments for the existence of God from it. Some of our arguments are
based on the demands of mortality, the existence of beauty, the normativity of
human rationality, religious experience etc.
Life in this way is most interesting such as the desire we have to look
outward and beyond us in the universe for clues of our existence. Will we
discover other living beings out there somewhere. As we explore far back into
our own past in history what might be found there. When we look into the nature
of knowledge, its possibility, scope, and general bases where will it lead in
our search for certainty in this life.
Out of history and the doctrines held absolutely to be real by the Church
there came also arguably a healthy skepticism. This skepticism became prepared
to consider the application of doubt even to oneself and not merely to other
things until a solid criterion of truth can be produced and we aren’t there yet
in this life.
Reading a little on metaphysics made me wonder upon ultimate reality
recently and what really exists and what is it that distinguishes existence and
makes it possible. Some of us search to find evidence that life has meaning and
purpose after our death. But what an anomaly this existence is for us to be a
part of all this life here, and maybe, it remaining yet to be revealed, perhaps
fantastically, far greater unknown possibilities may await us.
Again this existence is a state where we have a consciousness curiously.
The question could be then asked does our self-awareness in existence emerge
from sheer random chance or for a larger purpose. Can we survive our death and
find purpose in a future beyond our lives here and now. I believe that a future
with God does exist for us and that even for skeptics and atheists that it’s
premature of them to assume that there isn't something important to our being
alive and that life doesn’t have something in store for our future. The survival
of death would explain further our shared experiences, like the profound meaning
we know and feel in the love we have for each other.
I think that I know there is something beyond us and it’s God. He has a
guiding hand in matter constructing the design or blueprint and complexity of us
and our bodily systems and complex brains. He is responsible as well for the
curios and wonderful natural environment we find ourselves surrounded by. So I
think that there is something intrinsically valuable in the thought we now know
and have freedom to use.
I often wonder why God would be threatened in His omnipotence by human
freedom. He as God knows past, present and future and in this way therefore
understands the course human beings will take across time in every intellectual
investigation we undertake that searches for the truth. Will God condemn us for
roads He no doubt prepared for us to wonder down.
I would like to state this also that I feel that many people in life would
be truly kind, on a much larger scale, if they would only be allowed and
presented with the right opportunity to be so. The chance rarely presents itself
in life by opening up for us the opportunity for a seismic chance at
real kindness in a kind action we can take.
If many people among us could be transported somehow to 1944 Auschwitz
Germany to the concentration camps controlled by the Nazis what might that mean.
If somehow the SS guards could become distracted and the people seeking kindness
could offer the starving Jewish people there, women, men, old and young, heaping
bowls of meat stew. If in these people’s hands now was the opportunity to see
the suffering prisoners momentary joy and to feel their extreme gratitude in
their malnourished state as they ate the food gratefully. If people could give
the prisoners arm loads of loafs of fresh bread and also offer great sympathy
and reassurances that the war would soon be over and that they’d be soon
released how would showing that kind of love change them?
If we could love the people there in that awful place in history as human
beings many many people would find such a personal opportunity like this
for love, compassion, and kindness to be appreciated from them something deeply
satisfying to their souls.
In that act of love there would be no doctrinal differences of ideas about
who God is interfering in that concern for the prisoners because we'd simply be
acting in a way, at least then in that situation, that we could now see was
clearly intrinsically right and good. Such an obvious decision of how love works
in this instance defies a need for an ideological correctness of belief in
others and shows us love and how God really sees humanity I believe. The people
in the concentration camp could just as easily have been Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu
or any other group and to show love would matter just as much.
This is love and this is who I think God really is. This is and how God
will treat all of humanity not by our narrow road doctrines that look at
humanity and have us figuring from our hardness of heart that only few persons
of the human race will find Heaven. Love is the real language God deals in and
we only understand it’s light before us dimly.
When I posted this argument in a chat room yesterday making reference
to the concentration camp one reaction was voiced in reply particularly to it.
The remark that was voiced basically said that “this world suffers from over
population anyway”.
I guess I could interpret that unusual reaction to mean that feeding hungry
people is a wasted action in a world of over population by this belief. I could
maybe infer perhaps also that this person might see his own interests selfishly,
with a self entitlement to his food, and with little empathy beyond his own
immediate neighbors. Yet why do we here in North America consider ourselves by
this kind of logic to be the one’s of the world who shouldn’t starve and that
others in say Africa or India or China to be the one’s burdening the resources
of the planet and not us equally so.
The people in all corners of this earth are as equally human as anyone
anywhere else. Yet national, racial, religious, cultural identities dissect that
perspective alienating people from a belief in a shared equal humanity across
the planet.
Religion can dissect humanity into distinctions reducing the dignity of
other people. Patriotism does the same thing to our trust of others, our
understanding, and our compassion toward them. I profess this to be an error
most sinister if we think anything about other humanity other then in us trying
to bridge our divide with these other people.
All people in general believe that God supports their country ahead of, or
in spite of, the interest of others regardless which nation they live in.
Monarchs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, Dictators all proclaim that God loves
them and favors and supports them. It really doesn't matter to the people there
therefore if their nations are Socialist, Communist, a Kingdom, or a Democracy
because all believe the same thing and justify all kinds of actions, intentions
and conduct in the belief their favored and more important then everyone
else.
Finally our eyes and senses receive stimuli from the world and then our
brain organizes that stimuli using language and constructing concepts. Out of
this process, commonly in human nature, the tendency we have in our thought,
from it, is to judge others. In this way we unfortunately regularly judge each
other very imperfectly.
As we judge others we seem to not perceive within ourselves, in our own
minds, in how we form our own judgments our own great error. This error believes
commonly enough in human nature that instead of being unjust in our indignation
that we’re innocent and great in our views and opinions being justifiable
authorities in our views of the value of other people.Through our indignant
attitudes in judging we err greatly and all people at times of course do.
I think the tendency we have to err in judgment is an inherent and
prevalent one in human nature. We might understand that a lot of other people
have strange ideas and that often they are not simply just flawed but totally
wrong. Yet we still live under the illusion that our own particular attitudes
read and judge the world personally with flawless and accurate insight even when
we condemn others self-righteously.
When judging others it isn’t the case however that we are justified in
doing so. When we fail to see the worth of other people through our judgment of
them and when we justify that we’re righteous and worth something more then
someone else then we err. If who we speak angrily of isn’t worth anything then
we’re greatly mistaken in our judgment of other people then.
I suggest that It's not just ok to love others everywhere but that it’s us
with the greatest insight and understanding we can possess when we love all
other people in this world regardless of what their ideological condition is.
Yet we can't ordinarily grasp this kind of universal all encompassing love
when we see violent people or misunderstood other cultures. We see them instead
as being without our own beliefs about ultimate truth of who God is for
instance.
By showing an all inclusive love, however, it has an importance for our
lives more real then the current distinctions we make through our own ideology
lenses. This is true because it is really true that love is the ultimate
transcending language governing all things in life. Love seen for all life
everywhere deserves our true and real attention beyond our judgments of one
another. Whatever systems of mistaken thought we may know in the human race as
individuals or groups what it all comes down to is that we are all in various
states of unavoidable error. We need to love the human person in spite of the
moral or idea errors a person gets lost under the spell of in order for us to
find real wisdom.
The darkness was strung by the stars and as I observed them I kept wanting
to stop, and enjoy, and stare, and pray, but I was hurried instead to keep
moving on. So I left the hollow under the moonlight. Then it was another time
that I returned and came out under the stars again. I beheld this time that the
canopy of Heaven was still there and so I murmured and prayed there in that
valley beneath Heaven which I thought exploded in singing there in the weeping
of the morning dew around me.
I realized then in an instant it could be counted on that nothing surpasses
the greatness or the dignity of a human person. Human life, I clearly
recognized, was not just an idea or an abstraction. Human life is the concrete
reality of a being that is capable of love and this truth endures, this truth
will not go away.
Truth I knew will not pass or change. I was therefore reassured to have no
fear of moving into that unknown. I felt that God was with me and I understood I
could step out fearlessly knowing that no harm can befall me, all is very, very
well.
I then dreamed that night that I was in a dory rowboat and paddling across
the tranquil, bottomless, star lit, cosmic oceans of Nova Scotia riding and
rolling on the tides being there effected by gravity. I rolled there on the
water somewhere between the planets and those great unseen ravines of silence
out there. I was below the moon somewhere in that awesome emptiness.
Beloved, let us love one another; for love is of God; and every one that
loveth is born of God, and knoweth God.
1 John 4:7