What is paradise like?
I think in paradise the lives that were lived here on earth will be known
absolutely. People who were troubled, poor, and emotionally wounded will be
identified. Peoples short life, hardships, and terrors will be identified.
Whether they died from one of many plagues, from hunger, war, murder, or
ideologically cruel oppressive factors it will be known. If their death was from
an illness brought on by unsanitary conditions, because they had no health care,
or from poverty, it will be noted. Then people will receive eternal compensation
in love, joy and unending experiences in unlimited and joyful creativity.
In paradise each life may well be examined with a magnify glass. The real
expert there, who is capable of absolute and perfect discernment, will be
competently able to retrace every moment in time of each persons life. Every
wrong decision, every misunderstanding he/she came to, every experience that
brought out the worst in the person will be noted. Every bad example shaping
his/her identity leading him/her down an unhealthy path to follow will be noted.
All things will be seen clearly in the light.
Mercy then shall be distributed. Yet mercy won’t be according to human
measurement, which always sees only the accomplished as deserving good. This
mercy will be fair and understand the human condition in all it's complexity.
If another human voice, while here in the land of the living, objects to
this and wants to challenge it and prescribe another antidote we then might ask
is their prescription truly fair? What if that antidote for acceptance into
paradise only allows safe passage for those who succeed at discovering a better
way for themselves? is it a way, a path, that is really open to everyone
everywhere or just rumored to be such? Suppose it’s true that the people that
succeed and reach paradise do so only by arriving at that “supposedly only
saving answer?” Then are the conditions the other people knew who didn’t reach
that insight in their journey irrelevant to what everyone’s fate will end up
being in the end? Can there be no fairness and compensation for those who grow
up in other cultures for instance?
It seems by the doctrines presently held that there is no fairness. So then
I ask this: Why for fairness sake then is the better way (where everyone is
fairly understood) not the better of the two ways? Why can’t that option where
love understands: mistakes, misleading ideas, confusion, ideological persuasion
etc. be more obviously the plan and real nature and true character of God for
the world?
Jesus is good and I don’t think discounting His teaching, friendship, His
life, and death for sheer hopefulness on a fairer plan makes any sense. Yet
neither do I think that the belief that 9/10th of most of humanity has no hope
is any clearer belief.
I then decide to stick with Jesus and dispense with the narrow road to
life. All through history there have been atrocious horrors inflicted on
mankind. Religious wars were carried out as part of these doctrinal horrors.
Today if modern society and modern laws didn’t intervene I’d be disemboweled for
heresy for suggesting I dispense of the narrow road verse by the “God fearing
people.”
I don’t think I’m totally discounting it but I am saying we don’t truly and
totally understand it in our modern world.
Thought needs to be more forgiving and accepting of differing ideology
effecting our troubled humanity. The human person is not a perfectly insightful
agent capable of often even making the right decisions. Therefore I ascribe more
mercy to Gods plan and defy the people who preach the Gospels as only saying
Gods love will only reach in the end a few of the saved.
In paradise there are probably no valiant warriors on display rewarded for
acts of brutality and murder either. There in paradise love is probably more
clearly seen for it's self and it's true ways. If that be the case then love is
the prime mover and is the ultimate voice of reason there. Love would detest
violence, and that power of love, by it’s nature no doubt, spews the violent
there out of it's mouth like sour wine. Love instead would likely embrace, like
the Holy scriptures and Jesus teachings on earth: mercy, fairness, kindness, and
forgiveness.
In paradise the idea of love as a name only gets it’s power there attached
to and understood as belonging unto God. Here on earth we think we have some
authoritative insight into love in our discernment. If we do why do we pass such
terrible judgments on other human beings fates? We are not properly qualified to
condemn people or even to condone anyone. Our sights should instead have
compassion on human beings struggling with many different ideas.
Ideas themselves are never clear to the masses. The truth is in continues
dispute. Truth rests on this assurance here or that assurance over there or over
there. People then, mortal man still on the earth that is, decides "unfairly"
the fate of other mankind.
I wonder if in paradise God decides there to play no games. There in
paradise instead God opens Himself up to full view. Love is no longer seen
through a haze but becomes fully and marvelously appreciated for all who live
there. Hope is no longer a fleeting changing perspective. It is there that we
know that there is nothing that can hurt us and that God is
good.