On this planet earth that we inhabit there are numerous outlooks,
attitudes, values, morals, goals, and customs that are a part of all that we
know and experience here. Whatever form of persuasiveness these persuasions have
on us they will undoubtedly lead, inspire, and unfailingly win the loyalty of
each single mind to some perspective. We are individually standing alone in the
world and standing here now we will unavoidably adapt to these influences
knowingly or not. As a lone person we now stand mysteriously before uncertainty
standing here before the utter unknown.
For anyone hungry for truth, or at least relevancy in how one chooses to
live or care about what matters, that persons journey then, as a mind being fed
perspective, is a journey busy acquiring some form of knowledge and truth
perspective. What that person will be confronted by in life is different for
each person everywhere too.
Despite any hesitation that person has, or resistance in allowing change,
inevitably and unavoidable that person will be persuaded and changed in the
world somehow by the worlds ideas. Whatever continent or culture one is from
ideas are being experienced there. The person will encounter human arguments by
preachers, teachers, advisers, friends, political leaders, media etc. These
persuasions will then form what that person normalizes and sees as their truth.
It can be observed naturally enough by reason that ideas then shape human beings
everywhere right?
If our imperfect minds are being adapted imperfectly to different
influences, and I’m being shaped in this way, as is everyone else, then our
experiences cannot be anything other then unique and different then. The
persuasion these ideas have on people must be better for some, worst for
others, from Iran to Moscow to Bangkok to Brazil and to the entire world beyond.
The effects that different influences of thought has on people are these not
influences falling on the perceptions then of innocent people.
I believe we can suspect and look at people when they have different
political objectives in a way where they aren’t like us exactly. How do we view
people when they are militant or their nationalism and position in the
world isn’t in harmony with ours. How do we view foreigners when their religion
is foreign to us. With Christians when other people far away from us deny our
claim of salvation and deny who God is supposed to be how do we see them
really. Can these other people, after their different ideology is accounted for
in their different thinking, be seen as the same blank
slate, as innocent, vulnerable, susceptible people. Isn’t that what we all
really are in this world as we struggle to understand.
Do some of us approach the people of other nations like they
were predestined by God to be inherently evil people.
From birth we see no child anywhere in the world as inherently evil.
Why then does it seem in the same breath as we say that no child in the world is
evil do so many of us, of course not all of us, then lose sight of the intrinsic
value of entire populations of the men and women there. Just twenty years
later now the once children, now young men and women, have become
so different. They have supposedly in our eyes perhaps reached the age of
accountability. It is like they were faced with such a fair chance to think like
we think. Now it is like for many of us like they exist somewhere God is not.
As adults how did these people stop sharing our humanity. True many
informed people love their enemy and wish well on everyone but many
don’t. True these others might hate us and have an agenda that rivals us. They
may even want to hurt us. Yet why do they not appear to us as innocent victims
of doctrine that has shaped their minds. These people were after all won over by
a dictator or preached to by a different religious influence in
that state. These people were shaped by breezes of ideas often naively and
innocently enough. They were persuaded by persuasions that we all adapt to, if
confronted by the same kind in the same way. It is true that these ideologies
can come in a truly ugly form but the human person is vulnerable to
indoctrination, is drawn to group dynamics and to causes to live and die for
like every human being.
In our defensiveness of the threat posed by other people lost to evil
influences out of self preservation and our defense of our values we will of
course be guarded and prepared to fight for those values. Yet should other
people ever lose their human dignity. Do they ever lose their value as children
of God. Why must we hold so many human beings with such suspect in our eyes
for what is unavoidable. What is unavoidable is that ideas are harnessed and
spread and effect masses of humanity through indoctrinations that they can’t
foresee. Shouldn't we therefore have compassion on our fellow human beings like
us everywhere. What we instinctively seem to do is judge others and categorize
them according to ideological correctness but is this really fair.
As a human person we have dignity and a great potential for good. The evil
in the world doesn’t have to come with clarity for us and probably never has
when it affected us across history. Evil just effects minds everywhere who don’t
understand a better way confusing a person and harming them and others.
There is no guaranteed way to avoid evils persuasion on the innocent
person. Evil effects a persons reasoning, judgment and behavior. Evil inspires
deviousness, hatred, it justifies war and does indignities to human life while
robbing peace. Evil steals family members to death, leaves people alone, and
forsakes the poor and needy.
Evil wishes to humiliate people. There is no guarantee that others effected
by evil won’t intrude into your life or mine. Its effect on us is
very possible as we try and live a good life.
We all have minds that are struggling for peace. We want to be loved and
naturally enough to be treated well. The human person, wherever that person is
in this world, is fallible, and being fallible a person is
universally ill-equipped and ill-suited to be ideologically lead in one
“specific” direction. We are not able, all of us at once, everywhere we are, to
be able to hold one specific belief of what is supposed to be the “truth.” We
cannot know that specific belief all of the time and in all of the places.
Everyone cannot know the truth now even if part of the truth is
really attainable in this world. People by nature, simply by the the laws of
opportunity and chance, will choose differently when faced with
ideas. Naturally people see the world differently. The arguments around those
people will be different which means a belief for them on their individual
journey through the world is different.
Do we choose to love people everywhere and spare them our ideological
condemnations. Is it right instead to hold the position that if people don’t
think like me, and those I’m familiar with, they are not on the right side of
God and His mercy and His hope. Do we determine therefore, “That those other
people over in another part of the world do not see the truth as I see the
truth.” Do we reason then that, “They have not accepted the truth and therefore
those other people have no future with God.”
Is there any compassion or fairness in this view as we consider it at this
time in history. In modern times now, in the way we now presently know the world
to work, does this even make sense. Is this the position that God would take on
this.
"Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? Yet not one of them will fall to
the ground outside your Father's care. And even the very hairs of your head are
all numbered. So don't be afraid; you are worth more than many
sparrows.”